Includes Russell Rockwell, "Marx's Mature Critical Theory, Marcuse, and Post-Marcuse"
Abstract
Marx’s
mature critical theory, Marcuse, and post-Marcuse
Critical Theory, at
least in the work of Herbert Marcuse, has always interpreted contemporary
society by analyzing the internal relationship between the actual and the
possible. This has meant determining the social resources that are present or
are in development, which point the way toward freedom in a post-capitalist
society. Recent works by economists, such as Race Against the Machine, and The
Second Machine Age, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAffee, point to a new
stage of digital and robotic technologies, which echoes as today’s reality or
near-reality much of what Herbert Marcuse sketched as a distant but determinate
possibility in the “Prospects of Containment” section of One-Dimensional Man. Moishe Postone, perhaps the most important
theorist among the current generation of Critical Theorists, recognized
Marcuse’s theoretical achievements, which included systematic analyses of the
principal categories of what Postone has termed “Marx’s mature critical
theory”. Hence Marcuse repeatedly interpreted and subjected to careful analysis
in the context of contemporary developments not only Capital, but works unpublished in Marx’s lifetime, i.e. Grundrisse and Critique of the Gotha Programme. Yet, Postone, in revisiting that
all-important relationship of the actual and the possible, critiques Marcuse’s
social theory of one-dimensionality by developing Marx’s concept of an
“intrinsic contradiction”: on the one hand, direct labor as the sole source of value (the specifically capitalist form
of wealth), and on the other, the logic in capitalism for replacing direct
labor through automation, in today’s terms, with digital technology and robots.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EMkTi7WgJIRDZxRUs1QXlPLUE/edit?usp=sharing
According to Marx, a major flaw in capitalism is the problem of surplus labor whereby the bourgeoisie property owners profit not by selling their product at a price above the cost of materials plus labor, but rather by paying the worker less than the value of their labor. This ability of the bourgeoisie to manipulate workers allows them to devalue labor, thereby creating profit for themselves by lowering the price of labor.
Marx said “accumulation of wealth at one pole is, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole... ”
Or more simply, 350:1 CEO:worker pay ratios exist for no other reason besides psychopathic greed and exploitation
Or if you prefer a much sunnier view, read the words of scholar Garikai Chengu:
"Capitalism is like cancer. Once it enters a host country's economy, it will spread and devour labor, the environment, and any other impediment to the growth of profit. Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell. The essence of capitalism is to turn nature into commodities and commodities into capital. However, the world cannot continue to get richer as the earth becomes poorer. Just as the only inevitability in life is death, the only inevitability about our capitalist way of life, is the death of our planet and our civilization."
Dystopia, indeed.